Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 686 (PNJ)

SHEELA @ SHILA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRR/564/2026 · 2026-03-05

Anoop Chitkara

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRR-564-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRR-564-2026 Date of Decision: 05.03.2026 SHEELA @ SHILA AND OTHERS ......... Peoners Versus STATE OF HARYANA ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Aadil, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Karan Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed for se&ng aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, whereby applicaon under Secon 311 CrPC for recalling and re-examining PW-1 Karan Singh and PW-2 Anita and PW-3 Sagar has been allowed. 2. A3er arguing for some me and facing strenuous opposion from the State counsel, counsel for the peoner seeks permission to withdraw the present peon with a request that the trial Court may be directed to grant the peoner ample opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses and also sufficient opportunity to lead defence evidence. 3. Considering the fact that the applicaon under Secon 311 CrPC has been allowed, the trial Court shall ensure that ample opportunity is granted to the peoner for cross-examinaon, if required, as well as for leading defence evidence as may be cited to rebut the evidence of witnesses PW-1 to PW-3. 4. With the aforesaid observaon, the present peon is disposed of having been withdrawn. It is clarified that ample opportunity shall not be read as many as opportunity sought by peoner. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 05.03.2026 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.03.09 13:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.