IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18767 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ranjan Dubey S/o- Harendra Dubey Resident of Village- Sukal Dumar PS- Bhore, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Adesh Raj Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that petitioner along with Harendra enticed minor daughter of the informant on 03.07.2025 and her daughter while fleeing took jewellery worth Rs.40,000/- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant along with his father. It is next submitted that police after investigation submitted final form exonerating his father Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18767 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/3 Harendra Dubey but then charge sheet came to be submitted against the petitioner without investigating the case in its correct perspective. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant alleges that the victim while fleeing took jewellery from the house also, which amply demonstrates that the victim also accompanied the petitioner. It is also submitted that the case has been compromised as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that the victim did not support the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS but then under parental pressure she supported the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18767 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 3/3 with Bhore P.S. Case No.316/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T