SITARAM MEENA S/O LATE SHRI NARURAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3864/2026 · 2026-03-06
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6856 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6856 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3864/2026 Sitaram Meena S/o Late Shri Naruram Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village And Post Raghunathgarh, Via Piprali, District Sikar Presently Working On The Post Of Lecturer (History) In Govt. Sr.secondary School Singhasan District Sikar ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
3. Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Singhasan District Sikar
4. Dinesh Kumar Saini, Presently Working On The Post Of Lecturer (History) In Govt. Sr. Secondary School Mandawariya District Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Barala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 06/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner against transfer order dated 10.01.2026, has been disposed of by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 19.02.2026, directing the petitioner to make a representation before the competent authority describing his difficulties and objections against the transfer order, and the petitioner is also ready to make a
[2026:RJ-JP:9585] (2 of 2) [CW-3864/2026] representation; however, hardship of the petitioner has not been properly considered by the Tribunal and the petitioner has been transferred in the mid-session.
2. In the light of above, it is directed that in case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner against transfer
order dated 10.01.2026, the competent authority shall decide the same in accordance with law by a speaking order.
3. However, even if the representation is decided against the petitioner, the petitioner shall not be relieved from the present place of posting till 31st of March, 2026, and shall be allowed to continue his work at present place of posting.
4. Writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/30