- 1 - aba1591.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1591 OF 2026 Kesarsingh Dhansingh Jarwal ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. A. K. Bhosle, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. B. Jadhav, APP for the State. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026. PER COURT : 1. Since it was argued before this Court that the Applicant had suppressed his criminal antecedents, this Court was disinclined to entertain the application. In view thereof, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application, with liberty to prefer fresh application by disclosing antecedents of the applicant within a period of one week. 2. In view of judgment in case of Zeba Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh & others in Criminal Appeal No. 825 of 2026, the position of law is clear to the effect that it is the obligation of the applicant to disclose his criminal antecedents, and non-disclosure thereof amounts to suppression of material facts. - 2 - aba1591.26.odt 3. Having regard to the same, though this Court is inclined to permit the applicant to revive his request, the same cannot be permitted within a period of one week, as sought. Accordingly, application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to revive his request after a period of one month from today. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) dyb