Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 68521 (MAD)

C.Mohan Raj v. The Tahsildar

WP/5255/2026 · 2026-02-23

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 5255 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 5255 of 2026 1. C.Mohan Raj Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Perambur Taluk Office, Chennai District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025 and consequently to issue a correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records as Survey No.43/2 instead of Survey No.53/2, in respect of (i) the property covered under Sale Deed No.3695 of 1980 bearing survey No.43/2, T.S. No.55, presently T.S. No.55/3 situated at Perambur, and (ii) the property covered under Salem deed No.3694 of 1980 bearing survey No.43/2, T.S. No.55, presently T.S. No. 55/2, situated at Perambur, Chennai within such time frame as may be fixed by this Honourable Court For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.Jagadeeswari For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to issue correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5255 of 2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the aforesaid property. He has sought for correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records from the respondent through his representations dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025. Since the said representations have not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s representations as stated supra are considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 05.11.2025 and 08.11.2025, seeking for correlation certificate by correcting the survey number in the online revenue records for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5255 of 2026 property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 23-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The Tahsildar Perambur Taluk Office, Chennai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5255 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 5255 of 2026 23-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis