HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9073 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. raised an objection by submitting that in this application, the applicant has not explained his criminal antecedents as required under the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub-Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 2. On being confronted with this objection, the Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application explaining the criminal antecedents of the applicant in view of the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub- Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by the Learned counsel for the applicant, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above- mentioned liberty. 4. Certified copies may be returned to the Learned counsel for the applicant. September 11, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ripusudan Dubey, Savita Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Dheeraj Chamaar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad