Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010085562026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/25/2026 M/S W. K. INDUSTRIES AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM/INDSTRIAL UNIT HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILES, KHANAPARA, DIST. RI BHOI, MEGHALAYA, REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GAURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GAURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. W.K. INDUSTRIES R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) ASSA VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT, ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE Page No.# 2/4 DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. ASHOK SARAF, MR. N N DUTTA,MR S J SAIKIA,MR P K BORA,B SARMA,MR. A. KAUSHIK Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/2328/2018 M/S W. K. INDUSTRIES AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM/INDSTRIAL UNIT HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILES KHANAPARA DIST. RI BHOI MEGHALAYA REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GAURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GAURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. W.K. INDUSTRIES R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 27.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. The connected writ petition i.e., WP(C)/2328/2018 was dismissed for non- prosecution. The instant Miscellaneous Case has been filed for restoration of the case. After perusing the reasons as explained in the instant Miscellaneous Case, this Court is convinced that the matter should be restored. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Case is disposed of by restoring the Page No.# 4/4 connected writ petition. Let the matter be listed after 2(two) weeks. Registry to reflect the name of the learned Standing Counsel, SBI in the cause list. JUDGE Comparing Assistant