Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6844 (JHR)

MANSUR ANSARI ALIAS MD. MD. MAMSUR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1928/2026 · 2026-04-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11594 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1928 of 2026 ------ Mansur Ansari @ Md. Md. Mamsur Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Kalim Ansari, resident of Vill-Sisai Basti Sisai, P.O. & P.S.-Sisai, Dist.-Gumla … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 21.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Complaint case no. 1212 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 9, 44, 49B, 50, 51 and 52 of Wild Life Protection Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal poaching of Pangolin. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 22.12.2025, as mentioned in para 12 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2026 in B.A. No.3121 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Gumla in connection with Complaint case no. 1212 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 21.04.2026 Gunjan-