Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6843 (MAD)

MR.P.HARY MATHEW v. THE CHAIRMAN

WP/9584/2026 · 2026-03-11

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.9584 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.9584 of 2026 P.Hary Mathew ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.B00, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Deputy Secretary, Vigilance, TNEB(W) Chennai. 3.The Assistant Engineer (Thousand Light) The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.61, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 4.The Assistant Director (In charge), The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.61, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 5.P.John Bosco ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9584 of 2026 issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 04.02.2026 within a time frame stipulated by this Hon’ble Court. For Petitioner : M/s.Rheefna Jerold For Respondents : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh O R D E R By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 04.02.2026 within a time frame stipulated by this Court. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made representation dated 04.02.2026 to the respondents seeking to disconnect the new service connection given to the petitioner’s property in the name of P.John Bosco, however, there is no response. Hence, this Court may issue direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9584 of 2026 04.02.2026 and to pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time frame. 4.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2026, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders after providing opportunity to the aggrieved party, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 11.03.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.B00, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9584 of 2026 M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri 2.The Deputy Secretary, Vigilance, TNEB(W) Chennai. 3.The Assistant Engineer (Thousand Light) The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.61, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. 4.The Assistant Director (In charge), The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.61, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006. W.P.No.9584 of 2026 11.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis