Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 684 (JHR)

VIKRAM KUMAR SAW ALIAS VIKRAM SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1560/2026 · 2026-03-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:6428] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1560 of 2026 ------ Vikram Kumar Saw @ Vikram Saw, aged about 32 years, S/o Krishna Kumar Saw, R/o Azad Nagar, Bhuli A Block, Near Lal Bhawan, P.O.- Bhuli, P.S. Bank More, Dist- Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-11-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Katras P.S. Case No. 362 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 111(3), 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a member of an organized crimes syndicate and in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused persons, was involved in the activities of the said criminal syndicate of demanding extortion from the businessman of Katras, Dhanbad. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that in the charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.10.2025 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations have already been admitted to bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 18.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 15 of 2026, 18.02.2026 in B.A. No. 11560 of 2025 and 12.02.2026 in B.A. No. 12010 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Dhanbad in connection with Katras P.S. Case No. 362 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.03.2026 Saroj/