Shivani Irappa Adargunchi v. Irappa Yellappa Adargunchi
MCA/112/2026 · 2026-09-04
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6839 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6839 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 927-MCA-112-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2026 Shivani Irappa Adargunchi VERSUS Irappa Yellappa Adargunchi ….. Mr. Govind Gangaram Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant. ….. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE :
04 SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT :
1. The present Application is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.A- 109/2025 filed by husband for decree of judicial separation before the learned Family Court, Nanded to learned Family Court, Pune.
2. Learned advocate for the respondent – husband had initially opposed the transfer application stating that two addresses of the applicant – wife are mentioned in the title clause, one is of Pune and the other is of Nanded. However, at the request of this Court, the learned advocate has taken instructions from the respondent – husband and on instructions, he makes a statement that the applicant – wife is residing at Pune.
3. The distance between two places are approximately 450 km. The Applicant does not have source of income. She has also filed proceeding Kiran Kawre
2 927-MCA-112-2026.odt under the provision of Domestic Violence Act before the learned JMFC, Pune. Although the said proceeding is filed subsequent to the Petition for judicial separation filed by the Respondent, he has not moved an Application for seeking transfer of the D. V. proceeding.
4. In view of above, the Application is allowed. The Petition being HMP No. A-109/2025 for judicial separation filed by the Respondent is transferred from file of learned Family Court, Nanded to file of learned Family Court, Pune.
5. In the event the respondent - husband makes an application for appearance through video-conferencing, the same may be considered favorably and permission to appear through video-conferencing may be granted on such dates and at such stages as is deemed appropriate by the learned Family Court, Pune.
[ ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ] Kiran Kawre