Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6837 (BOM)

MS P.P. JOSHI THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRAFULLA PRAKASH NAGAPURKAR JOSHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

CA/8371/2026 · 2026-08-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 7.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8371 OF 2026 IN WP/153/2025 MS P.P. JOSHI THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRAFULLA PRAKASH NAGAPURKAR JOSHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 153 OF 2025 ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Solanke Shrikrashna B. GP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.B. Girase Advocate for Respondent No.2 in WP : Mr. V.P. Patil … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 29.08.2026 PER COURT : . For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ which is as follows : “B. This Hon’ble Court may please to grant leave to the applicant to amend the writ petition as stated in the para no.2 of the civil application and for that purpose issue necessary orders.” 2. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of four (04) weeks. Amended copy be served on the other side. Respondents are at liberty, to file reply to the amended Writ Petition. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:39712-DB