DARSHANI DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROGH D. M.
C407/16/2022 · 2026-06-12
Siddhartha Sah
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6836 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6836 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:4751 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C-407 No.16 of 2022
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Heard Mr. Milind Raj, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. S. R. S. Gill, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. V. S. Rawat, learned A.G.A. for the State and Mr. Himanshu Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Prashant Khanna,
learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the trial has already culminated and as such the present Transfer Application has become infructuous.
3. In view of the statement made above, the present Transfer Application is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
12.06.2026 Akash