Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6835 (KAR)

NINGAIAH v. SRI B L NANJAPPA

MSA/107/2022 · 2026-02-06

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7292 MSA No. 107 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO.107 OF 2022 (RO) BETWEEN: 1. NINGAIAH S/O.KARIGOWDA SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LRS. SMT.SUSHEELAMMA W/O.CHIKKAMOGGAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SMT.RADHA W/O.BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. SRI VENKATESH S/O.LATE NINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SMT.PUTTAMANGALA W/O.KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 5. SRI KUMARA S/O.LATE NINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT B.HOSURU VILLAGE KEREGODU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571 446 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI BASAVARAJU P., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7292 MSA No. 107 of 2022 AND: 1. SRI B.L.NANJAPPA S/O.LINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI B.N.KRISHNA S/O.LINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. SRI B.H.NAGARAJU S/O.HANUMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 4. MS.SUNITHA D/O.B.H.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 5. MS.VEDAVATHI D/O.B.H.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 6. MS.ANITHA D/O.B.H.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT BILIDEGULA VILLAGE KEREGODU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571 446 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRAMOD R., ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2; NOTICE TO R-3, R-4 & R-5 IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O. DATED 25.10.2024; R-6 IS SERVED) THIS MSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER XLIII RULE 1(u) OF CPC PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 10.10.2019 PASSED IN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7292 MSA No. 107 of 2022 RA.No.02/2019 BY I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANDYA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants files a memo stating that the appeal has become infructuous. The said memo is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration. SD/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24