Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6835 (HP)

STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER v. Pawan Kumar

CMP.M/158/2026 · 2026-04-20

Bipin Chander Negi, Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. D-12 State of H.P. & another vs. Pawan Kumar CMP(M) No. 158 of 2026 20.04.2026 Present: Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants. Counsel for the State has pointed out that the writ petitioner was appointed afresh against a vacant post on 05.08.2013 (Annexure R-2), as a Trainee Electrician on temporary basis and on an earlier occasion, the petitioner had been working as a contractual employee under CDC Scheme from 17.01.1996. He further submits that directions have now been issued to regularize his services after having completing five years service from the date of initial appointment, as has been done in the case of Smt. Rajni Sharma, whereas actual benefits have been restricted to three years prior to filing of the writ petition. Counsel for the State seeks time to obtain instructions as to the status of the other nine employees detailed in office order dated 05.08.2013 (Annexure R-2). In such circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that since the delay in filing the appeal is only of 8 days and the application is duly supported by the affidavit of the official, therefore, the delay of 8 days is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered. LPA No. /2026 To come up for consideration on 15.06.2026. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin C. Negi) 20th April, 2026 Judge (kck)