1 2026:CGHC:18632 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5649 of 2022 * - Ajay Prakash Paul S/o Late Shri Simon Paul, Aged About 61 Years (B.E.T.O.) R/o Bade Kilepal (Bastanar) Tahsil And District Baster (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Upper Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Health Services Chhattisgarh Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Joint Director Health Services Division Baster Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer, (CMHO) Jagdalpur District Baster (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Shri Anil Kumar Badkas, Supervisor, Presently Posted As In-Charge District Extension And Resource Officer, Office Of Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Lohadiguda District Baster (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Dushyant Dayal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Dheerandra Pandey, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 23/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.i That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.23 16:54:52 +0530 2 10.ii That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ for directing the respondents to immediately given entire charge post of In-charge District Extension and Resource Officer, Office of Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Lohandiguda instead of respondent no. 5 i.e. Shri Anil Kumar Badkas supervisor. 10.iii That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the order impugned passed by respondent no. 4 on dated 14.07.2020. 10.iv Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.v That, any other relief, which the petitioner is entitled and this Hon’ble court deems it fit may kindly, be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner has already got retired from services on account of superannuation. 3. Taking into consideration the prayer made in writ petition and further fact that the petitioner has already retired from services, in my opinion, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti