[2026:RJ-JP:13034] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5347/2026 Smt. Indubala Singh, W/o. Sh. Narpat Dan, R/o. Maa Hinglaj Nagar Vistar, Lalarapura, Gandhi Path West, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302021. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Registrar Of Trademark, (Govt. Of India), Near Chanakyapuri Over Bridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) 2. M/s. Hira Enterprises, Having Its Registered Office At-37- A, Rajaspura Peth, Satara-415002, Maharashtra, India. Through Its Director/ Representative ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Munendra Singh, for Mr. Devang Chaturvedi, for Respondent No. 1 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 25/03/2026 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer to issue directions to the respondent no. 1 to proceed with and dispose the petitioner's application No. 6119813 dated 21.09.2023 for registration of the trademark. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application for registration of trademark was submitted by the petitioner on 21.09.2023 under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act. The respondent-Registering Authority has failed to dispose the application submitted by the petitioner even after passing of more than two and a half years. Counsel has also made reference of the order dated 07.08.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ [2026:RJ-JP:13034] (2 of 2) [CW-5347/2026] Petition No. 18998/2022 Mrs. Nirmala Kabra V/s The Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr., wherein the Coordinate Bench vide Para 9 has observed as under:- " Excessive delays in resolving the applications seeking registration of Trademark indeed undermines the very purpose of filing such applications. When the matter is unnecessarily prolonged, it can lead to a number of negative consequences, including the loss of evidence and increased costs along with a sense of injustice to the parties involved. " Taking into consideration the material facts of this case that the application for registration of the trademark is pending for more than two and a half years and so also the observations of the Coordinate Bench in case of Mrs. Nirmala Kabra (Supra), the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the directions are issued to the respondent-authorities to proceed with and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for registration of trademark at earliest. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The respondent-Registrar of Trademark is directed to proceed with and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for registration of the trademark as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /34