Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6833 (AP)

MUDDAPU KALYANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8640/2026 · 2026-07-22

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010150182026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8640/2026 Between: 1. MUDDAPU KALYANI, D/O. MUDDAPU APPALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, FEMALE, R/O. D.NO.71-31-549, TRINADHAPURAM NEAR SCHOOL, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM-530011. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503. 2. THE GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM-530005. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, GAJUWAKA, ZONE-6, GREATER VISAKHA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM-530046. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrieved by the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering into the construction activities of the petitioner premises bearing D.No.24-1-1/4, MIG-1, VUDA Layout Phase-ll, Pedagantyada Village, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam inspite of building permit No.1086/4585/B/GWK/PDA/2025, dated 07.03.2026 as illegal, irregular, 2 arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession, enjoyment and construction activity of the petitioner's property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere into the peaceful possession, enjoyment and construction activities of the petitioner’s building in bearing D.No.24-1-1/4, MIG-1, VUDA Layout Phase-ll, Pedagantyada Village, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8640 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:23.07.2026 RSD 4 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8640 of 2026 Date: 23.07.2026 RSD