SEEMA KINNAR CARE OF REKHA KINNAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/831/2026 · 2026-03-16
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 683 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 683 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10880] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 831/2026 Seema Kinnar Care Of Rekha Kinnar, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 55, Near Sooraj Cinema, Bhiwadi, Police Station Phoolbag, District Khairthal Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 16/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 459/2025 registered at Police Station Neemrana District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) of BNS and 3/25 of Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is in-charge of the Kinnar community at Neemrana region. It is submitted that the applicant is in custody ever since 26.09.2025 and the applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and as per the charge-sheet, primary accused, who has shot/murdered the deceased, namely Pawan Gurjar. It is also submitted that neither there is any tangible evidence against the applicant nor any CDR records/substantive records qua the
[2026:RJ-JP:10880] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-831/2026] presence of the applicant at the place of commission of offence which reflects involvement of the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that organized crime was committed wherein accused-applicant and the co- accused, who was his/her disciple, have been engaged a shooter, namely Pawan Gurjar, who commit the crime as the victim was not honoring the commitment of sharing the consideration with the accused-applicant, who was in-charge of the community of Kinnar. It is further submitted that the co-accused was in constant touch with the shooter-Pawan Gurjar. Moreover, it is submitted that the offence committed is heinous in nature and there was motive. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused- applicant is in custody ever since 26.09.2025; that there exist no tangible evidence and CDR records available which reflects the participation of the applicant in commission of the offence, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him/her on bail. 5.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Seema Kinnar
[2026:RJ-JP:10880] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-831/2026] Care Of Rekha Kinnar shall be enlarged on bail provided he/she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his/her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /29