Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6826 (BOM)

LAXMAN MAROTI BASWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

REVN/47/2026 · 2026-09-04

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 936crirevn47.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 47 OF 2026 Laxman Maroti Baswar ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. A. R. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. C. V. Bhadane, APP for the respondent/State Mr. N. R. Thorat, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. During pendency of this Revision Application, Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for the informant submits that trial has already proceeded with recording of the evidence of the witnesses. 2. The Applicant is challenging the order passed by the learned trial Court thereby rejecting the discharge Application. 3. Since the trial is already proceeded further according to the learned Advocate for the informant, the revision has become infructuous. 4. Hence, the Revision Application is disposed of as infructuous. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] VishalK/936crirevn47.26 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:41030