Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6823 (HP)

REENA DEVI v. NARENDER KUMAR

CMP/3843/2026 · 2026-03-11

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Reena Devi & Ors. Vs. Narender Kumar & Anr. CMPs No. 3843 & 3844/2026 in FAO No. 255/2020 11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sative Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. CMP No. 3843/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicant/appellant No. 4 for discharging her natural guardian, as she has attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from matriculation certificate, appended with the application as Annexure A-1, wherein her date of birth has been mentioned as 12.07.2004, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicant/appellant No. 4, Miss Sarita alias Surita is ordered to be discharged and she is permitted to pursue the case in her own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 3844/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/appellant No. 4, ...2... Miss Sarita alias Surita, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. As per learned counsel for the applicants/appellants the award has attained finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality, as till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court, the same is allowed and the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/appellant No. 4, Miss Sarita alias Surita, as per her share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been given in para-7 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 11th March, 2026 (raman)