[2026:RJ-JP:12658] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1023/2026 Prabhati Lal Meena S/o Late Shri Gulab Chand Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Gram Chatarpur, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 25/03/2026 1. This pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in connection with FIR No.210/2022 registered at Police Station Ramnagariya, District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 384, 420, 406, 120B & 506 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that perusal of the FIR would reveal that matter is of a purely civil nature with regard to the ownership of the plot in question i.e. plot No.C-78 located in the housing society ‘Shri Narsingh Arcade’. Counsel submits that there is no direct evidence against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged crime and only omnibus allegations have been levelled in the FIR. He argues [2026:RJ-JP:12658] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1023/2026] that offences are triable by Magistrate. In such circumstances, no fruitful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bar. Hence, this pre-arrest bail may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender as several other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced at bar, especially considering the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender as seven more cases of similar nature have been registered against him as well as looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to extend the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner at this stage. 6. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application stands dismissed. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of this bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /47