SIRMOHAR @ SIRMOR S/O RATAN SINGH JATAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1434/2026 · 2026-03-18
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6821 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6821 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1434/2026 Sirmohar @ Sirmor S/o Ratan Singh Jatav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Nahida Ka Pura, Police Station Salempur, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.A. Naqvi, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 159/2025 registered at Police Station Salempur District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) & 324(4) of BNS,
2023. 2. Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. N.A. Naqvi, on behalf of the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 40 years. It is further submitted that on the alleged date of incidence i.e., on 04.10.2025, the victim (deceased) and his brother abused the applicant’s wife and that on account of the same, an altercation has taken place between the applicant and the victim. It is next submitted that a cross FIR was also came to be registered in this regard and that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and the trial is running at snail’s pace. It is also submitted that the alleged act
[2026:RJ-JP:11649] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1434/2026] was done by the applicant in exercise of self-defence and that there was no intention/motive to cause death of the victim. It is also submitted that only single injury has been inflicted to the victim in exercise of self-defence, where aggressors were the side opposite. It is further submitted that no recovery has taken place from the applicant. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents pending against the applicant and that the applicant is behind bars since 29.10.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. It is submitted that heinous allegations have been levelled against the applicant and that the injury attributed to the applicant is the primary cause of death. 4.
Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of family, aged about 40 years; that present is the case of registration of cross FIRs wherein the charge-sheet has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents pending against the applicant; that the applicant is behind bars since 29.10.2025, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sirmohar @ Sirmor S/o Ratan Singh Jatav shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial
[2026:RJ-JP:11649] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1434/2026] Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/50