Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6820 (AP)

SMT.E.SUGUNA v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.

WP/39441/2022 · 2026-07-28

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010662152022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 39441/2022 Between: 1. SMT.E.SUGUNA, UN-EMPLOYEE, W/O. D.RAMANA NAIK, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. A.L. COLONY, NR PALLY (P), C.K DINNE (M). Y.S.R. KADAPA DIST. A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVT OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AP. 2. THE SELECTION COMMITTEE, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN/DIST COLLECTOR, YSR DIST. KADAPA, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT TRIBAL WELFARE OFFICER, YSR DIST, KADAPA, A.P. 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, SC CORPORATION, YSR DIST, KADAPA, A.P. 5. THE DIST EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, YSR DIST, KADAPA, A.P. 6. THE DIST EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ANNAMAYYA DIST, KADAPA, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of 'MANDAMUS-declaring the action of the 2nd respondent 2 herein in selecting the non-genuine candidates and orally rejecting the request of the Petitioner vide her representation Dt 22-11-2022 requesting to verify the genuinity of the 5th class certificate submitted by the other selected candidates for the post of Watchman/office watcher vide the notification in Ref No A5(JD-SW) /94/2022, Dt 06-8-2022 in reference to the prior notifications and not appointing the Petitioner though eligible as illegal, violative of Art 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, capricious, and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to the respondents to Appoint the Petitioner for appointment as Watchman/Office Watcher forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Respondents herein to consider the request of the Petitioner vide her representation Dt.22-11-2022 to verify the genuinity of the 5th class certificate submitted by the other selected candidates for the post of Watchman/office watcher in pursuance of the notification in Ref No: A5(JD¬SW) /94/2022, Dt 06-8-2022 in reference to the prior notifications for the said posts forthwith, pending Disposal of the W.P, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.39441 OF 2022 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.07.2026 KBN 4 14 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.39441 of 2022 Date: 29.07.2026 KBN