Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6818 (ALL)

SALAUDDIN v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/8471/2026 · 2026-09-13

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8471 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. raised an objection by submitting that in this application, the applicant has not explained his criminal antecedents as is required under the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub-Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 2. On being confronted with this objection, the Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application explaining the criminal antecedents of the applicant in view of the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub- Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by the Learned counsel for the applicant, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above- mentioned liberty. 4. Certified copies may be returned to the Learned counsel for the applicant. September 14, 2026 Sachin Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyam Narayan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Salauddin .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad