Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6817 (CHH)

PRATHMIK KRISHI SAKH SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT BHOTHALDEEH v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1684/2026 · 2026-04-19

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17821 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1684 of 2026 Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Bhothaldeeh Procurement Center Bhothaldeeh, Registered Society Under Cooperative Societies Act, Registration No. 1266, Through Its Salesman And Paddy Purchase Incharge- Manoj Sahu, S/o Shri Chandrabhan Sahu, Aged About 44 Years, Procurement Center Bhothaldeeh, Branch Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed), Sector - 21, C.B.D. Complex, 6th Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Registrar Chhattisgarh Cooperative Society, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Bank Limited Raipur, Pandri, Indira Gandhi Parisar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Collector Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 7 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Maryadit, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 8 - The Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 9 - Branch Manager Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur, Branch Saraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 10 - The Officer On Special Duty Apex Bank, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.22 11:03:37 +0530 2 11 - The Chief Executive Officer Head Office District Cooperative Central Bank Limited Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 12 - The Nodal Officer District Cooperative Central Bank Limited Raipur, Branch Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For Respondents 1,3,5,6 & 8/State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer For Respondents 2 & 7 : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate For Respondents 9,11 & 12 : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 20.4.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction, commanding the Respondent No. 2 & 7 to lift and transport the entire remaining stock of purchased paddy as per State policy and tripartite agreement, at the earliest; 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents Authorities to constitute the Committee and compensate the petitioner Society for loss caused due to non- lifting of paddy within prescribed time limit i.e. 31.03.2026; 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents Authorities to compensate for weight-loss paddy of about 633.99 quintals and also compensate for loss caused during non-lifting paddy period from 15.01.2026 to 06.02.2026 (about 23 days); 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to restrain the respondents/Authorities from taking any coercive action, including the registration of FIRs or recovery proceedings against the Petitioner Society or its office bearers, for variation in quality of paddy resulting from the respondents' inaction to lift/transport the stock. 3 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case in the favour of the petitioner. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that they have no objection if above prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 4. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini