Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6814 (RAJ)

BOBBY S/O UDAIVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4513/2026 · 2026-03-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12542] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4513/2026 Bobby S/o Udaiveer, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jatoli Ratbhan, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwar For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.44/2026 registered at Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 125, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he fired a gunshot with the intent to cause injury. However, as per the FIR, it is evident that no injury was caused to anyone. He further submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Petitioner is behind the bars since 06.03.2026 without any [2026:RJ-JP:12542] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4513/2026] criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. In support of his contentions, he has filed the affidavit of complainant-Roop Chand endorsing the factum of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that both parties have arrived at a compromise and that there is no objection to grant the bail to the present petitioner. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bobby S/o Udaiveer, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/64