Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6814 (BOM)

UJWALA VIJAY BHOSLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

CA/9472/2026 · 2026-08-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1046.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1046 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9472 OF 2026 IN WP/4805/2026 UJWALA VIJAY BHOSLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Yawalkar Siddhartha B. AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. Neha B. Kamble … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 29.08.2026 PER COURT : . Heard. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of three (03) weeks. After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to respondents, including the added respondents returnable four (04) weeks thereafter. Learned AGP waives service for respondent/State. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:39709-DB