Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-168 119 (6) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
State of Punjab and Kartar Singh
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-394- Singh is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in brought on record as legal representatives of Singh, to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
MAIN CASE
Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others
order of even date.
15.01.2026 sanjay
1680-2005 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
***** RFA XOBJR Date of Decision: 15.01.2026
State of Punjab and anr.
Versus Kartar Singh (deceased) through LRs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the XOBJRs/ landowner
-.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) -CI-2025 Application for impleading LRs of is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para 3 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Registry to tag the same at appropriate place.
MAIN CASE
For orders, see RFA No. Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others
order of even date. 15.01.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-1680-2005 (O&M) and XOBJR 71-CI-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2026
…….Appellants Versus (deceased) through LRs. ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab for the appellants. Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate / landowners. Application for impleading LRs of respondent Kartar is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of respondent Kartar , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. RFA No.1674-2005, titled as State of Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others, decided vide
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Yes/No
for the appellants. respondent Kartar is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be respondent Kartar , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is State of , decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.30 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document