Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6813 (PNJ)

STATE OFPB.ETC. v. KARTAR SINGH

RFA/1680/2005 · 2026-01-15

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-168 119 (6) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA State of Punjab and Kartar Singh CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-394- Singh is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in brought on record as legal representatives of Singh, to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. MAIN CASE Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others order of even date. 15.01.2026 sanjay 1680-2005 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA XOBJR Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 State of Punjab and anr. Versus Kartar Singh (deceased) through LRs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the XOBJRs/ landowner -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) -CI-2025 Application for impleading LRs of is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para 3 of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. MAIN CASE For orders, see RFA No. Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others order of even date. 15.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1680-2005 (O&M) and XOBJR 71-CI-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 …….Appellants Versus (deceased) through LRs. ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab for the appellants. Mr. V.K. Kataria, Advocate Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate / landowners. Application for impleading LRs of respondent Kartar is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal representatives of respondent Kartar , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. RFA No.1674-2005, titled as State of Punjab and another Vs. Hardev Singh and others, decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No for the appellants. respondent Kartar is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The the application are ordered to be respondent Kartar , to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is State of , decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.30 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document