SHUBHAM DATTATRAY HAJARE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
ABA/996/2026 · 2026-09-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6812 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6812 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 25 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 996 OF 2026 SHUBHAM DATTATRAY HAJARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for the Respondent/State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Learned APP for the State seeks time for want of investigation papers.
2. The record indicates that this is the fourth occasion on which such a request has been made. There is reason to believe that the Investigating Officer is not interested in opposing this application. Hence, for this reason alone, the application stands allowed in the following terms:
ORDER (i) Application is allowed. (ii) In the event of arrest of applicant in connection with Crime No. 344/2026, registered with M.I.D.C. Police Station, Dist. Ahilyanagar, for the offence punishable under Sections 123, 223, 274, 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount. (iii) He shall not contact the witnesses directly or indirectly. 25 ABA 996.2026.odt 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:41222
(iv) He shall not interfere with the evidence in any manner whatsoever. (v) He further directed to cooperate the investigating agency for further investigation.
3. Learned APP for the Respondent/State to communicate this order to the concerned Police Station.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 25 ABA 996.2026.odt 2 of 2