Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6811 (AP)

Sri Mushini Venkata Narasimham, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15415/2025 · 2026-07-28

Alapati Giridhar, D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010305632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 15415 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sri Mushini Venkata Narasimham,, S/o Saheb, Aged about 59 Years, Occ Chief Executive Officer, R/o D.No. 1-139, Settibalija Street, Godilanka, East Godavari Distric ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Department, Secretariat,Amaravathi,AndhraPradesh. 2. The District Cooperative officer DCO, Amalapuram, Dr. B.R Ambedkar Konaseema District. 3. The District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, (C.E.O)., Kakinada, Kakinada District. 4. M/s Godilanka Primary Agricultural CoOperative Credit Society Limited, Godilanka, Allavaram Mandal, East Godavari District rep. by its Official Chairperson. 5. The District Level Empower Committee DLEC, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Covenor/ Chief Executive Officer (CEO), District Co- 2 Operative Central Bank ltd., Pithapuram Road, Nagamalli Thota Junction, Kakinada, East Godavari District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 officials in preventing the petitioner to be in service upto age of 62 years, even after 4 Respondent passing resolution dated 17.03.2025 thereby increasing the age of retirement of petitioner from 60 to 62 years as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of natural justice, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules made therein, consequently direct the respondents to continue the service of the petitioner till he attains the age of 62 years and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner services till he attains the age of 62 years in 4th Respondent, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondents:SRINIVAS BASAVA The Court made the following order: 3 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) A Memo has been filed by Sri D.V. Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner on 24.07.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH __________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR 29.7.2026 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION No. 15415 of 2025 29.7.2026 BSM