[2026:RJ-JP:16294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7062/2024 1 Ramesh Meena Son Of Shri Sukhji, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Village Suratpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. 2 Gulwati Wife Of Late Ramprasad, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Village Suratpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. 3 Sandeep Son Of Late Ramprasad, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Suratpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. 4 Pinky Daughter Of Late Ramprasad, Wife Of Mahesh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Nijrana, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. 5 Rabina Daughter Of Late Ramprasad, Wife Of Manoj, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Kanakpura, Tehsil Nangal, District Dausa. 6 Rekha Daughter Of Late Ramprasad, Wife Of Sunil, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Kanakpura, Tehsil Nangal, District Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1 Smt. Mathuri Wife Of Gopilal, Aged About 94 Years, Resident Of Village Bhanwarki, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur. 2 Hari Son Of Gopilal, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Bhanwarki, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur. 3 Kirodi Son Of Gopilal, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Village Bhanwarki, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur. 4 Bundu @ Bindu, Son Of Gulabbuddin, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Bhanwarki Tehsil Bamanwas, At Present Firozpura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 5 Navvu Son Of Gulabbuddin, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Bhanwarki Tehsil Bamanwas, At Present Firozpura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 6 Kallu Son Of Gulabbuddin, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Bhanwarki Tehsil Bamanwas, At Present Firozpura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 7 Salya Son Of Gulabbuddin, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Bhanwarki Tehsil Bamanwas, At Present Firozpura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 8 Nayab Tehsildar, Sub-Tehsil Barnala Tehsil Barnala [2026:RJ-JP:16294] (2 of 3) [CW-7062/2024] 9 Sub-Registrar, Barnala, Sub-Tehsil Office Barnala. 10 Land Holder (Tehsildar), Tehsil Office Bamanwas. 11 State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Kamwar Mr. Vaibhav Nirmal Mr. Bharat Todi Mr. Subham Rohilla Mr. Lakshya Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 17/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 22.03.2024, passed by learned Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapur City, in Civil Case No. 08/2020, whereby the application of the plaintiff-petitioner under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties fairly submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been settled by this Court in the judgment rendered in a bunch of case led by Kamlesh & Ors. vs Pappu Saini & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17903/2025 (decided on 10.04.2026). The relevant paragraph of the Kamlesh (supra) reads as under:- "27. In view of the above discussion, this Court is of the considered opinion that an insufficiently stamped document is inadmissible in evidence unless proper stamp duty and penalty are paid. Such a document cannot be admitted even in the form of secondary evidence to bypass the statutory bar. Further, the photocopy [2026:RJ-JP:16294] (3 of 3) [CW-7062/2024] document cannot be impounded under the 35 of the Act of 1998 by the Court." 3. Considered. 4. In view of the judgment passed in the case of Kamlesh (supra), this Court finds no error in the impugned order dated 22.03.2024, so as to warrant interference in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the present civil writ petition is dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/147