MC(Cont. Case(C) No. 18 of 2026 Page 1 Item Nos. 53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(Cont. Case(C)) No. 18 of 2026 [Ref: Cont. Case(C) No. 140 of 2022] M. Sule …Applicant/s Vrs. M. Harekrishna & 8 Ors …Respondent/s -B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 30.07.2026 Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, Md. Fakharuddin, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2, Mr. S. Suresh, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 & 5. None appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 6. The present application has been filed with a prayer for impleading the following 4 officers as respondents nos. 6, 7, 8 & 9 in the connected Cont. Case (C) No. 140 of 2022:- 1. Lamgin Singsit, Treasury Officer, Senapati Government Quarter, Senapati Mini Secretariat, SP. Office Complex, Senapati – 795106. 2. Rebek Lalparvul, Treasury Officer, Sadar Hills, DC Office Complex, Kangpokpi – 795129. 3. Biju Keisham, Treasury Officer, Chandel, DC Office Block-D, P.O & P.S. Chandel – 795127. Lucy Gurum ayum Digitally signed by Lucy Gurumayum Date: 2026.07.30 17:50:00 +05'30' MC(Cont. Case(C) No. 18 of 2026 Page 2 4. Lucy Haokip Luthang, Treasury Officer, Churachandpur, Treasury Square, Central Lamka, Churachandpur – 795128. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that due to subsequent development which occurred after filing of the connected contempt case, the above mentioned 4 officers are required to be impleaded as respondents nos. 6, 7, 8 & 9 in the connected contempt case as they are the responsible officers for complying with the direction given by this Court. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and on examination of the record, this Court is of the considered view that impleadment of the above mentioned 4 officers in the connected contempt case as respondent nos. 6, 7, 8 & 9 are necessary. Accordingly, the impleadment application is allowed. Registry is directed to incorporate the above name officers as respondent nos. 6, 7, 8 & 9 in the connected contempt case. With the aforesaid direction, the present application stands disposed of. JUDGE Lucy