Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6809 (JHR)

MANISH KANAUJIA v. THE STATE OF JHAKRHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPT.OF REVENUE, REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORMS,RANCHI

WPC/2759/2026 · 2026-04-21

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11528 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.2759 of 2026 ----- Manish Kanaujia aged about 57 years S/o Late Mohan Kanaujia resident of A-23, Chandra Vihar Colony, Bartand, P.O.: Nagnagar, P.S.: Dhanbad District: Dhanbad, State: Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Ranchi having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S.: Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834004 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi having its office at Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, P.O.: G.P.O., P.S. Sadar, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand, Pincode: 834001. 3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ranchi having its office at Collectorate Building, Kutchery Chowk, P.O.: G.P.O., P.S. Sadar, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand, Pincode: 834001. 4. Circle Officer having its office at Namkum, P.O. & P.S.: Namkum, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand, Pin code: 834010. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Pasari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III …...... 02 /21.04.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land belongs to this petitioner and the rent was being collected from the mother of this petitioner. He submits that after the death of mother of this petitioner, the petitioner applied for mutation but the respondents have kept the matter pending and not passed any order. It is his contention that suffice it would be if a direction is given to respondent no.4-Circle Officer, Namkum, Ranchi to dispose of the application of the petitioner after passing a reasoned order. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that if the application of the petitioner is still pending an appropriate order will be passed in accordance with law. 2026:JHHC:11528 2 4. Considering the submission of the parties, I direct the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 4-Circle Officer, Namkum, Ranchi along with the copy of this order within four weeks from today, who will consider the case of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks thereafter. 5. If the claim of the petitioner is rejected for any reasons whatsoever the reasons should be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 21.04.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 21.04.2026