2. On 10.02.2026, this Court had passed the following order: Learned counsel submits that there is a delay of 6 days in lodging the FIR. The allegations against the petitioner are of having raised lalkara, attributed to him nor snatched any amount. Co accused/Lovenish Sharma has been granted interim anticipatory bail vide order of in any other case. He is ready and willing to join investigation as and when require agency and will cooperate. Learned counsel for the complainant made submissions in opposition. Adjourned to 10.03.2026. , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that there is a delay of 6 days the FIR. The allegations against the petitioner are of having raised lalkara, however, neither any injury attributed to him nor snatched any amount. Co- accused/Lovenish Sharma has been granted interim anticipatory bail vide order of even date. He is not involved in any other case. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating Learned counsel for the complainant made Adjourned to 10.03.2026. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.10 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 18.02.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Balkar affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 10.02.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.10 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.