Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6807 (RAJ)

SWEETY SHARMA W/O LATE SHRI ARUNESH KUMAR SHARMA v. SECRETARY, SANSKRIT EDUCATION

CW/4882/2026 · 2026-03-23

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4882/2026 Sweety Sharma W/o Late Shri Arunesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, Employee Id Rjsm202032042040 R/o House Number 3227, Near Kucheswar Mahadev Mandir Jai Lal Munsi Ka Rasta Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Sanskrit Education, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Commissioner, Sanskrit Education, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Deepa Singh for Ms. Manju Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/03/2026 1. It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have considered representation dated 25.02.2026 filed by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner herself pointed out two places, which may be convenient to her, if she is posted there. 2. Accordingly, order dated 19.03.2026 has been passed by the Commissioner Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby the petitioner has been posted at Government Varisth Upadhya Sanskrit School, Badi Chaupar, Jaipur, which is also one of the place opted by the petitioner in her representation. Learned counsel submits that in view of order dated 19.03.2026, which has been passed by the respondents on the representation submitted [2026:RJ-JP:12121] (2 of 2) [CW-4882/2026] by the petitioner, no cause of action for pursuing this writ petition survives. 3. Copy of representation dated 25.02.2026 and order dated 19.03.2026 as produced by learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record. 4. This factual position has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /243