Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6807 (JHR)

BAJO RAY ALIAS BAJU RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1222/2026 · 2026-04-21

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:JHHC:11555 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1222 of 2026 Bajo Ray @ Baju Ray aged about 25 years, S/o Manharan Ray … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Geasen, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Add.P.P. --- 06/21.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025 in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319 (2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court at Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application and this statement has not been denied by the State in the counter affidavit. He submits that during investigation one victim has supported the case and the charge sheet has been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025. He also submits that the similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail including Amar Singh @ Amar Paras Singh in B.A. No. 1219 of 2026 and Jabir Ansari in B.A. No. 1529 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer but the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts that the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent and similarly situated co-accused have been 2 ( 2026:JHHC:11555 ) enlarged on bail, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court at Deoghar, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 21.04.2026 Uploaded on: 21.04.2026 MM/