2026:JHHC:11199 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 926 of 2024 --------- Hare Ram Singh, aged about 53 years, son of Shri Bhuneshwar Singh, resident of Mohalla-Panchwa, Ward No. 4, P.O. & P.S. Chatra, Town & Dist. Chatra. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Praveen Kumar Toppo, Secretary/ Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Town and Dist. Ranchi. 3. Dr. Marry Neelima Kerketta, Chairman, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having office at Circular Road, P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, Town & Dist. Ranchi. ……… Opp. Parties With Cont. Case (C). No. 1137 of 2024 --------- Ram Prakash Ram, aged 49 years, son of Sri Rameshwar Ram, resident of Mohall-Sripalli Court Road, near Railway Station, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Jamtara. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Praveen Kumar Toppo, Secretary/ Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Town and Dist. Ranchi. 3. Dr. Marry Neelima Kerketta, Chairman, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having office at Circular Road, P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, Town & Dist. Ranchi. ……… Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, Sr.SC-I Mr. Aditya Kumar, AC to Sr.SC-I Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG Ms. Shreyashi Shekhar, Advocate M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan, Advocates ---------- 07/ 17.04.2026 Pursuant to order passed on 06.02.2026, Mr. Pravin Kr. Toppo, Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi is present before this Court. He is being represented by Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, learned Sr.S.C.-I. 2026:JHHC:11199 2. Having regard to Annexure-A to the supplementary show-cause dated 15.04.2026, no contempt is made out. However, though appointment letter has been issued but the consequential benefits have not yet been given to the petitioners. 3. As such, the opposite party-State is directed to expedite the matter with regard to payment of consequential benefits. 4. Accordingly, both the contempt applications stand disposed of. Pending I.A.(s), if any, also stand closed. 5. The personal appearance of the Official present is dispensed with. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th April, 2026 Kunal/- Uploaded on 21.04.2026