OMKAR MAHESH DADMAL v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER CUM VICE CHAIRMAN THR.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE.
WP/6975/2026 · 2026-09-04
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6805 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6805 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 9 wp6975.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6975 OF 2026 Omkar Mahesh Dadmal Vs. The Joint Commissioner cum Vice Chairman, The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court' s or Judge' s Order Coram, appearances, Court' s Orders or directions and Registrar' s order Shri N.D.Jambhule, Counsel for the Petitioner. Shri Amit Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1 & 2. Shri Arnav Naik, Advocate h/f Shri Nikhil Gaikwad, Counsel for Respondent No.3.
CORAM :
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE & RAJ D.WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 04 SEPTEMBER, 2026.
1. Heard.
2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a limited prayer that respondent No.1/Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur be directed to decide caste claim of the petitioner towards “Mana Scheduled Tribe” and to issue Caste Validity Certificate within a stipulated period.
The petitioner is also seeking direction to respondent No.2/College and respondent No.3/State Common Entrance Test Cell (Agri) not to insist for Caste Validity Certificate and not to cancel provisional admission based on non-submission of Caste Validity Certificate. 2026:BHC-NAG:11732-DB
2 9 wp6975.26.odt
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of Notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
4.
Learned counsel Shri Arnav Naik h/f learned counsel Shri Nikhil Gaikwad waives service of Notice for respondent No.3.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in MH-CET Examination and already qualified. The petitioner has secured seat in B.Sc. Agriculture Course Now, the petitioner has already admitted on a condition that the petitioner has to produce Caste Validity Certificate. However, the caste claim of the petitioner is pending with the said Committee since January 2026. Now, respondent No.2/College is insisting for Caste Validity Certificate. If the Caste Validity Certificate is not produced, there is an apprehension of cancellation of the admission.
6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader and learned counsel for respondent No.3 have strongly opposed the said
contentions and submitted that considering it is being a pre- condition, Caste Validity Certificate is required to be produced.
7. After hearing both sides and perusing the entire record, it reveals that the caste claim of the petitioner is still pending with the said Committee. Now, the petitioner is apprehending cancellation of admission for want of Caste Validity Certificate and, therefore, he seeks protection. Now, this aspect is already considered by the Government Circular granting extension to produce Caste Validity Certificates to the SBC and OBC
3 9 wp6975.26.odt Categories. Therefore, the said benefit can be extended to the other social status categories also.
8. In view of that, we pass following order:
ORDER (1) The writ petition is disposed of. (2) The respondent No.1/Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur is
directed to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within a period of four months from today. (3) It is directed that respondent No.2/College and respondent No.3/State Common Entrance Test Cell (Agri) shall not insist the petitioner for Caste Validity Certificate and shall not cancel the provisional admission based on the non submission of the Caste Validity Certificate. (4) The admission of the petitioner would be subject to final outcome of the caste claim decided by the said Committee. (5) With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[JUDGE] [JUDGE]
!! BrWankhede, PS !! Signed by: Mr. B. R. Wankhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 05/09/2026 10:51:33