Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6804 (CAL)

TRIBENI SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/10117/2023 · 2026-04-08

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08/04 2026 AD/37/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/10117/2023 TRIBENI SARKAR Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Firdous Samim, Advocate Ms. Gopa Biswas, Advocate Ms. Salini Bhattacharjee, Advocate Mr. Md. Inzamamul Islam, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Mr. Saurav Mitra, Advocate …..for the WBCSSC Mr. Sayan Ganguly, Advocate ......for the State 1. In spite of service, there is no appearance on behalf of the School Authorities. 2. Petitioner's prayer seeking transfer was considered and allowed. The petitioner's name was recommended in respect of a school but when the petitioner went to join the recommended school, he was informed that there was no vacancy. 3. The petitioner seeks a direction upon the West Bengal Central School Service Commission for recommending his name in some other school where there is a vacancy. His application seeking recommendation is pending consideration before the West Bengal Central School Service Commission. 4. The West Bengal Central School Service Commission is directed to recommend the name of the petitioner to any of the schools opted by the petitioner upon verifying the vacancy status in such school. In the event there is no available vacancy, the petitioner will be entitled to submit a fresh list of preferred schools, which will be taken into account by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission to recommend the petitioner for transfer. P a g e | 2 5. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Urgent Photostat Certified Copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)