WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 and M.P.Nos. 2 & 2 of 2008 WP No. 8709 of 2008 1. A.S.Mani 2. G.Thandavan 3. M.Madhaiyan 4. K.P.Thimmarayasamy 5. B.Gurappa 6. S.G.Nagarajan 7. A.Prakasan 8. T.Krishnanan 9. T.Arumugam 10.P.Poosami 11.P.Murugan 12.P.Kannan 13.E.Krishnan 14.T.Krishnan 15.P.Selvan 16.G.M.Muninathan 17.S.Munusamy 18.P.Chinnathambi 19.M.Thangavel 20.N.Kamalesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintending Engineer Dharmapuri Electricity Circle, Distinction Circle, __________ p. 2 WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 Dharmapuri-5. 2. The Chief Engineer/Personal Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 3. The Chairman Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. ..Respondent(s) WP No. 22465 of 2008 Central Organisation of Tamilnadu Electricity Employees (Dharmapuri Circle), Rep. By its Circle Secretary Mr.K.Arulselvan, No.83-B, Kandasamy Vadhyar Street, Dharmapuri Town And Dt. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintending Engineer Dharmapuri Electricity Circle Distinction Circle, Dharmapuri -5. 2. The Chief Engineer/Personal Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. 3. The Chairman Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. ..Respondent(s) Prayer in W.P.No.8709 of 2008: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent passed in his proceedings in Memo.No.022897/1243/ADM.2/A1/F.LI/2001 dated 19.10.2001 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to prepare the fresh panel and issue orders based on the B.P.120 dated 20.12.1994 and B.P.6 dated 25.01.2000. __________ p. 3 WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 Prayer in W.P.No. 22465 of 2008: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to impugned panel published by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Memo.No.509/SED/Adm.2/A.1/F.FM/IGr/08-1, dt 04.08.2008, and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner’s union as per the 12(3) settlement arrived under Industrial Dispute Act, dated 15.10.2005. In both cases For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): No appearance COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) This matter had come up for hearing on 02.01.2026 when there was no appearance for either party in both Writ Petitions. Hence, it was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', when also, there is no appearance for either party. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed. (A.S.M.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 07-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssm DR.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J. __________ p. 4 WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 ssm To 1. The Superintending Engineer Dharmapuri Electricity Circle, Distinction Circle, Dharmapuri-5. 2. The Chief Engineer/Personal Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 3. The Chairman Tamilnadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. WP Nos. 8709 and 22465 of 2008 07-01-2026 __________