[2026:RJ-JP:15831] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5792/2026 1. Pappulal S/o Hajari, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Behind Kali Ka Bag, Town Newai, Police Station Newai, District Tonk (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner In District Jail Tonk). 2. Bhanwarlal S/o Hajari, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Behind Kali Ka Bag, Town Newai, Police Station Newai, District Tonk (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner In District Jail Tonk). 3. Lakshman @ Gordhan S/o Pappulal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Behind Kali Ka Bag, Town Newai, Police Station Newai, District Tonk (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Vijendra Yadav Mr. Ramesh Chand, I.O., ASI PS Niwai HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/04/2026 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5792/2026 qua petitioner No.1 Pappulal:- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file fresh after filing of the Challan. The permission sought for is granted. The present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [2026:RJ-JP:15831] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5792/2026] In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5792/2026 qua petitioners No.2 and 3:- 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.478/2025 registered at Police Station Newai, District Tonk for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 110 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both the petitioners have been implicated in the present case on the basis of false and concocted grounds. It is submitted that no specific injury has been attributed to the present petitioners Bhanwarlal and Lakshman. It is co-accused Pappulal to whom specific act for causing life threatening injuries has been attributed. Petitioners are behind the bars since 12.03.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. [2026:RJ-JP:15831] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5792/2026] 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Bhanwarlal S/o Hajari & Lakshman @ Gordhan S/o Pappulal, shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/41