MOLE VENKATESWARA REDDY, v. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD.,
CRLRC/222/2007 · 2026-07-29
Subhendu Samanta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6801 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6801 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010135362007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JULY 2026. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 222/2007 Between:
1. MOLE VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O.VENKA REDDY, R/O GURAVAREDDY PALEM, BOGOLU MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the Judgment in Crl.A.No. 11 of 2005, dt. 07-02-2007 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Nellore in Modifying and sentencing the petitioner U/s 326 of I.P.C., as per the Judgment of the Court of the Asst. Sessions Judge, Kavali in SC.No. 43 of 2003 dt. 05-01-
2005.
IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 266 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Judgment in SC.No. 43 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Asst. Sessions Judge, Kavali as the free copy of the said Judgment in the said case was filed in the Crl.A.No. 11 of 2005 and a copy of the Judgment in SC.No. 43 of 2003 is filed in the Crl.A.No.11 of 2005 and a copy of the Judgment in SC.No. 43 of 2003 is filed along with this Crl.R.C.,
2
IA NO: 2 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 281 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed upon the petitioner u/s 326 of I.P.C., by
Judgment dt. 07-02-2007 in Crl.A.No. 11 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, Nellore Division, Nellore, pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C., Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
3
The Court made the following Order:
Inspite of the matter is being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Courts below, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred.
3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court.
4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned.
5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and modified by the learned Appellate Court.
4
7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present petitioner to comply the order. Let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 30.07.2026 Note: C.C. by one week
(B/o.) SPP
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.222 of 2007
Dated 30.07.2026
Note: C.C. by one week
(B/o.) SPP