APHC010970722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 46903/2018 Between: 1. GADAMSETTI VENKATA VASANTHA VIJAY KUMAR, S/O VEERA PRASADA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.MULAGUNTAPADU VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. DARSI KALYANI DEVI,, W/O RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O KOVELAMUDI VARI STREET, SEETHARAMAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA CITY, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. GURRAM VENKATA SUBBAIAH,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O PAMURU ROAD, KANDUKUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. GURRAM ALEKYA,, W/O VENKATA SATYA MANOJ KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O PAMURU ROAD, KANDUKUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, A.P. 3. THE THASILDHAR, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM 2 VS,J W.P.No.46903 of 2018 DISTRICT, A.P. 4. VELAMURI SATYANARAYANA, S/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O PATA SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. VELAMURI HARI HARA SASTRI, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O PATA SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. VELAMURI PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O PATA SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. VELAMURI RAJESH, S/O MURALIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O PATA SINGARAYAKONDA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the high handed action of the 3rd respondent in attempting to dispossess the petitioners from their land to an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.1.16 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.34 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.32 cents in Survey No.607 respectively situated in Singarayakonda Village and Mandal, Prakasam District without any authority of law at the behest of the unofficial respondents, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of natural justice and pass Prayer is amended as per the Order of this Court dt 20/12/2022 vide order passed in IA 01/2022. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to dispossess the petitioners from their land to an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607 respectively situated in Singarayakonda 3 VS,J W.P.No.46903 of 2018 Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No. 46903 of 2018, dated 07.12.2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioners to amend the extends of their respective land to "an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.1.16 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.34 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.32 cents in Survey No.607" in the place of "an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607, an extent of Ac.0.14 cents in Survey No.607" respectively situated in Singarayakonda Village and Mardal, Prakasarn District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. S A RAZAK The Court made the following: 4 VS,J W.P.No.46903 of 2018 ORDER: Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Sri. I. Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 28.07.2026 Gss