[2026:RJ-JP:16048] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3814/2026 Shanu Singh S/o Banwarilal, R/o Chhipitola Police Station Kila Janpath Bareli U.p. (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Omkar SIngh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 790/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), and 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is alleged in the FIR that two persons came to meet with the complainant at bus stand and replace her gold ornament with other envelop. It is contended that no test identification parade was conducted and other similarly situated co-accused Sahnoor S/o Akhtar has already been enlarged on bail by the ADJ No. 3, Alwar vide order dated 16.01.2026. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The [2026:RJ-JP:16048] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3814/2026] accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that petitioner in pretext of cheating with the complainant replaced her gold ornaments. The petitioner alongwith other co-accused was apprehended and arrested on the same day and gold ornaments were recovered from his possession. The accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and resident of Uttar Pradesh and against him 12 cases pertains to IPC and other offences were registered, therefore, considering the above facts, his bail application deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shanu Singh S/o Banwarilal, in connection with FIR No. 790/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when [2026:RJ-JP:16048] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3814/2026] called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /62