CRWP-4341 IN THE (151) AKASH AND STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon at the hands representation 2. submitted tha 15.04.2026 (A Nagar, Mohali but the same thereon. He fu satisfied if ap 4341-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. A.S. Gulati, Advocate for the Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ***
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lif hands of respondents No.4 to 6 a tation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 (Annexure P-7) before the Senior ohali raising their grievances as me same has not yet been considered a He further submitted that at this st appropriate directions are issued NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4341-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the the life and liberty of the petitioners o 6 and to take action on their ure P-7). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on enior Superintendent of Police, SAS as mentioned in the present petition ered and no action has been taken this stage, the petitioners would be issued to respondent No.2-Senior 2026 f the g the ners their has on SAS tition aken d be AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4341 Superintenden representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec
16.04.2026 Amit Sharma 341-2026 (O&M) (2) tendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mo tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 15.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   r, Mohali to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

esaid ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.