Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67858 (MAD)

M.Kannan v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its

CRL OP/2194/2026 · 2026-02-03

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 M.Kannan ..Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Station House Officer, Vikaravandi Police Station, Villupuram District. Cr.No.838/2023 ..Respondent PRAYER Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to call for the records relating to the order dated 08- 07-2025 made in Crl.MP.No.1738 of 2025 in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2025 (CIS) in CC No.44 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vikravandi, set aside the same and allow the CMP. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the order dated 08.07.2025 made in Crl.MP.No.1738 of 2025 in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2025 (CIS) in CC No.44 of 2024 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vikravandi, and set aside the same. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows :- 2.1. The petitioner is an accused facing trial in C.C.No.44 of 2024 before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vikravandi, for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 30 4A of IPC in Crime No.838 of 2023, on the file of the respondent Police. 2.2. In the said case, the petitioner/accused filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.1738 of 2025 in Crl.M.P.No.2 of 2025 (CIS) under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., seeking recall of the witness, PW-13. The learned Judicial Magistrate, finding that the petitioner was attempting to delay the pronouncement, dismissed the petition, vide order dated 08.07.2025. Aggrieved over the same, the present petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that if the petitioner is not permitted to re-call and cross-examine PW-13, he will be put to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 grave hardship. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petition for recall was dismissed as early as on 08.07.2025 and further, NBW is also pending as against the petitioner. In such circumstances, he seeks dismissal of the petition. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the fact that NBW is pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined the allow this petition. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 03-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN To 1. The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vikravandi 2.The Station House Officer, Vikaravandi Police Station, Villupuram District. Cr.No.838/2023 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. MRN Crl. O.P. No.2194 of 2026 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis