APHC010241462018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 10593/2018 Between: 1. TALARI NARASIMHULU, S/O VOBANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O PATTEMVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDA THIPPA SAMUDRAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDA THIPPA SAMUDRAM MANDAL, PEDDA THIPPA SAMUDRAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 inclosing web land and not issuing copies of adangal/Pahani, 1B Namuna (ROR) from Faslai 1426 onwards in respect of the land covered by S.No. 1/1N an extent of Ac.5-00 of Pattemvandla Palli village, Pedda Thippa Samudram Mandal as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and 2 VS,J W.P.No.10593 of 2018 consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to open the Webland and furnish the copies of adangal/pahani, 1B namuna (ROR) to the petitioner in respect of the land in Sy.No.1/1N an extent of Ac.5-00 of Pattemvandla Palli village, Pedda Thippa Samudram Mandal, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to furnish the extract of adangal/pahani and 1B Namuna (ROR) to the petitioner by opening the web land in respect of the land in S.No.1/1N an extent of Ac.5-00 of Pattemvandla Palli village, Pedda Thippa Samudram Mandal, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K R SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.10593 of 2018 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 23.06.2026 and 30.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioner, as such, the matter was directed to be posted to 07.07.2026. Even on 07.07.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted to 28.07.2026, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 28.07.2026 Gss