SEEMA WIFE OF SHRI MANOJ SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4585/2026 · 2026-03-28
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6782 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6782 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13193] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4585/2026 Seema Wife Of Shri Manoj Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of House No. 20-21, Gurjaro Ki Dhani, Dev Nagar Colony Jaisinghpura Khor, Police Staton Jaysinghpura Khor, Jaipur North ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 28/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 388/2024 registered at Police Station Amer District Jaipur city(North) for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 of N.D.P.S. Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a woman aged 32 years, who is sole bread-earner of her family and she is behind the bars from past one month. It is submitted that the recovered contraband i.e. smack is 20 grams, which is less than the commercial quantity 250 grams and that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.
[2026:RJ-JP:13193] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4585/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the accused- applicant has a family to support; that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant; that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; that the recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge her on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Seema W/o Shri Manoj Sharma, shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J SHIVAM-AMAN/53