HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9219 of 2026 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed, today in Court, on behalf of opposite party no.4 is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 and learned AGA for the State are present. 3. In the present case, the FIR has been registered under Sections 74, 352, 351(3), B.N.S., Section 7/8 POCSO Act and Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act. 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant comes up with the prayer to withdraw the present appeal on the ground that he intends to file an application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. before the appropriate Court. 5. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Certified copy, if any, be returned as per rules. September 14, 2026 RA Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Agnivesh, Jadu Nandan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Santosh Rai,J.) Dinesh Pal .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad